The following from Bill O’Reilly distressed me.
“I’ll tell you why [religion’s] not a scam, in my opinion: tide goes in, tide goes out. Never a miscommunication…It always comes in, and always goes out. You can’t explain that.”
Of course the tides can be explained. Google offers three million results for “what causes the tides.” The Earth and the moon revolve around a common center of gravity. Centrifugal force creates a bugle in the ocean that accounts for a high tide. On the opposite side of the Earth, the gravitational pull of the moon creates a second bulge , accounting for another high tide. As the Earth rotates on its axis each day these two bulges circle the earth creating two high tides a day.
O’Rreilly’s misplaced confidence & shoddy workmanship
My distress come not from O’Reilly’ not understanding the moon’s effect on the ocean. I am sure he does stand alone in that failing. What distresses me is that he took on it on faith that he had his understanding of the tides was complete–that he knew that the the tides were unexplained. Furthermore he was so sure, so willing to express this view on TV without first taking two minutes to research it or ask some productions assistant to check it out. That is a frightening amount of confidence about a subject he is clearly not familiar with.
When I first read about his comment I thought maybe it was an off-the-cuff remark that just came to him while taping. But the clip indicates he had plenty of opportunity to prepare. The topic of the segment was atheism and this point–the inexplicable tides–was his main argument for the existence of god. God should get a better pitchman.
To be fair, a few minutes before making his comment about the tides, O’Reilly warned the viewers by admitting he is not “the smartest guy in town.”
Arthur C. Clarke formulated three “laws” of prediction. My favorite is:
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
This video for a new translation app for iPhone/iPod Touch is magic. It seems too good to be true I am shocked that this technology exists, let alone can fit in a $200 hand held. Oh and it is a free app.
Check out Word Lens on iTunes.
This August my friends and I ran the Hood to Coast Relay race. I put together a video of our experience.
An MP4 version. (High Resolution; 64mbs)
And a shorter version I made on my iPhone on the way back to Portland. (High Resolution; 106mbs)
Sometimes you receive a really great voice mail from a friend or a loved one that you want to preserve or share. Getting off your iPhone can be real pain. Lifehacker instructs you to jailbreak your iPhone or use and audio out cable. Both of these methods are less than ideal. Jailbreaking may void your warranty and in this digital age an analog transfer is weak sauce. The best solution I have found is pretty quick and all digital. It retrieves actual voice mail file from the backup of your phone made by iTunes. Using Pádraig’s iPhone/iPod Touch Backup Extractor, voice mails can be easily extracted. Below is an overview of the process followed by a quick screencast walkthrough.
- Download the free iPhone/iPod Touch Backup Extractor.
- Make a small donation to Pádraig.
- Sync your iPhone. Note that if you encrypt your iPhone backups, you will not be able to extract the voicemails.
- Launch iPhone/iPod Touch Backup Extractor.
- Click Read Backups and select the backup that contains the voicemail you want to extract. For most people there will only be one backup to choose. Only people with multiple phones will have to choose the correct backup. For them the name of the phone and the date of the last backup will help.
- Scroll to the bottom of the list of Application Names that appears, select iPhone OS Files, and click Extract.
- Switch to the Finder and navigate to the folder into which you extracted the iPhone OS Files.
- Your voicemails are in iPhone OS Files/Library/Voicemail/.
- The voicemails are numbered files with the file extension .amr. Quicktime will open an play them. iTunes won’t.
If you have any suggestions or improvements for copying voicemails from an iPhone please let me know.
Last weekend was the annual P&G Dividend Day at Kings Island in Mason, Ohio. On Dividend Day P&G rents the whole park and employees and their families are treated to free admission. We had an jaw-dropping good time. Especially on the new Diamondback roller coaster, which we road at least half a dozen times. We tried to count how many attractions we rode but lost count around 17 or 18, including the Diamondback, Firehawk, Backlot Stunt Coaster (formerly known as the Italian Job), The Crypt, Flight Deck, Vortex, Adventure Express, Congo Falls, Xtreme Skyflyer, and the Sling Shot. All these rides lead me to the conclusion that I prefer the fast, smooth rides that create excitement with fluid, even acceleration over the rides that rely on jerky rapid changes in direction. I read that as we get older our brains shrink and rattle in our heads a little more. ((http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/56598.stm)) The more fluid, less jerky rides are probably gentler on our brains but still create pleasurable anxiety with the acceleration, speed, height, and inversion. Below are some some videos documenting the fun.
Flight Deck, a suspended roller coaster, is one of our perennial favorites. Most of our friends are willing to take this ride so no one feels guilty about leaving someone out. This year was the first year I sat in the front seat. As we approached the top of the first incline the structure below us ended and for a second I thought there was a serious problem, then I remember the track is above the car—some pleasurable anxiety for sure. I was also thoroughly entertained by how wide the cars swing out on the twists and turns. You can see the wide swinging turns in the video. After the final turn the cars swings to almost horizontal.
The Sling Shot
On our way to lunch we noticed the Sling Shot, which normally costs $20 per ride, was going for only $10 per ride. What a bargain. I have always wanted to ride the Sling Shot but could never justify spending $20 on a 90 second ride while in a park offering dozens of other rides for free. But this time we decided to spend the extra cash. It was worth it. The Sling Shot was a lot of fun. The launch is fluid and quiet, you see mostly sky so the only way you can judge your acceleration is by the sinking feeling in your stomach, a great feeling in this case. Friends have commented that they have avoided this ride because it spins. But this is a misconception. There were no full spins, just some rocking. Sometimes we rocked forward and faced the ground, but mostly we were facing up and out. At $5 or $10 a ride the Sling Shot offers great acceleration and affords a nice view of the park.
The Skyflyer, like the Sling Shot is one I have avoided because of the cost. But on Dividend Day the price was only $5. The leisurely ride up to the zenith affords great views of the park and ample time to second guess the decision to embark on the ride. At first we were laughing, joking, and enjoying the view, but as we went higher my wife’s tone changed, she tersely told us to “quit screwing around this is serious.” I laughed but silently agreed the ultimate height was more than I had anticipated. Once the zenith was reached the crew gave the instruction to pull the rip cord and begin the drop. The first few seconds are just free fall, the cables are not taught and gravity is the only force you experience, a special, natural, fun force. The video gives the impression that when the cables do engage there is a great jerking feeling but the video lies. The transition feels pretty smooth, just like the rest of the experience, which is just swing freely through the air while the wind rustles your hair.
The Diamondback was undoubtedly our favorite. It is fast, tall and smooth, there is no herky-jerky rattle or breakneck turns. And the wait-times were reasonable. For our first ride we didn’t have to wait at all when we used the single-rider line. Not surprisingly they closed the single-rider line immediately after us. But even the regular line never lasted more than 30 minutes and was usually less than 15-20 minutes. The front car is by far the best experience, with its unobstructed view of the park and the track, you get the full effect of the 215ft drop an the 80 mph wind in your face (and a few bugs too). The Diamondback is so smooth it kind of ruined the Vortex for us. After the Diamondback the Vortex felt remarkably jerky. The way the head’s in front of me were wiping back-and-forth, I thought the people in front were going injure their necks. My neck didn’t feel to good either.
Irony (noun): incongruity between what might be expected and what actually occurs.